Start Here
An Introduction to the Entropic Governance Framework (EGF)

Who this is for

This page is intended for policymakers, programme managers, system architects, risk professionals, sustainability practitioners, and institutional decision-makers who work on complex decisions with long-term consequences.

You do not need a background in physics, economics, or systems theory to begin here.

If you are dealing with decisions that:

• are difficult or impossible to reverse,
• shift risks or costs into the future,
• lock institutions, infrastructure, or societies into particular paths,
• or involve trade-offs between present needs and future capacity,

then this framework is relevant to your work.

The problem EGF is trying to address

Many governance and sustainability decisions today are evaluated using proxy indicators: emissions targets, efficiency gains, compliance checklists, and short- or medium-term cost–benefit analyses.

These tools are useful. But they often miss something fundamental.

Some decisions look acceptable—or even optimal—at the time they are made, yet they quietly: narrow future options, reduce adaptive capacity, create lock-ins that are hard to escape, or impose irreversible costs on future or non-consenting actors.

Once these effects become visible, it is often too late to undo them.

The Entropic Governance Framework (EGF) starts from a simple question:

EGF does not tell decision-makers what to choose. It asks them to confront what cannot be undone.

What EGF is and what it is not

EGF is

• a governance framing for long-horizon decision-making,
• a way to surface irreversible consequences early,
• a discipline for reasoning under constraint,
• a lens that complements existing sustainability and risk tools.

EGF is not

• a carbon accounting method,
• a sustainability score or index,
• an optimisation or forecasting model,
• a policy prescription,
• or an economic ideology (growth, degrowth, or otherwise).

EGF does not replace existing frameworks. It asks a different kind of question—one that many frameworks implicitly defer.

When EGF is most useful

EGF is particularly relevant in contexts such as:

• Infrastructure planning (long lifetimes, siting decisions, path dependence)
• Disaster recovery and reconstruction (urgent choices that lock in vulnerability or resilience)
• Technology deployment (including AI) (capability lock-in, irreversibility of diffusion, governance lag)
• Institutional reform (rules and structures that are hard to unwind once embedded)
• Environmental and resource governance (thresholds, tipping points, cumulative loss)

If your work involves decisions where “we can fix it later” may not be true, EGF is designed to be a useful companion.

How EGF approaches sustainability differently

Many sustainability approaches focus on reducing harm or improving efficiency. EGF focuses on future optionality.

Instead of asking only:

• “Is this efficient?”
• “Is this compliant?”
• “Does this meet today’s targets?”

EGF asks:

• “What irreversible commitments are being made?”
• “Which future options are being closed—and for whom?”
• “Over what time horizons do these effects persist?”
• “Are we making these trade-offs consciously, or by default?”

This shift does not eliminate value judgements. It makes them explicit, especially when consequences cannot be reversed.

How to explore EGF

You do not need to read everything. Depending on your interest, start here:

• If you want the core argument and architecture:
  → EGF-W1: White Paper
• If you want to see how EGF can be tested or falsified:
  → EGF-R1: Research Agenda
• If you are concerned about ambiguity or overreach:
  → EGF-N1: Clarifications & Scope
• If you are interested in practical decision workflows:
  → EGF-G1: Entropic Decision Gates
• If you are sceptical and want to see how EGF is stress-tested:
  → EGF-A4: AI-Assisted Adversarial Stress Testing (Protocol)

Status of the framework

EGF is a pre-standard framework.

It was developed independently and outside any institutional or funding mandate. It is intentionally provisional.

The framework is published to:

• invite critique,
• encourage falsification,
• surface weaknesses,
• and improve clarity around irreversible decisions.

EGF does not claim certainty. It claims that some constraints are not negotiable, and that ignoring them merely postpones reckoning.

How to engage

You are welcome to read and critique the documents, test the ideas against your own cases, identify failure modes or blind spots, or challenge the framing directly.

Correspondence and critique can be sent to:
egf@entropicgovernance.org

The canonical white paper (EGF-W1) is archived and citable via OSF (DOI). Where discrepancies exist, the archived version takes precedence.

A final note

EGF is not designed to replace judgement.

It is designed to slow down the moment where irreversible commitments are made, long enough for their consequences to be seen, named, and owned.

If this resonates, you are in the right place.